When I became a dentist, I thought I was happy, but this…

As I’ve already said, Spring Training started today. That may or may not set you off, but I’m fired up today. I can’t get enough news, I can’t hear enough glorious predictions, and I can’t wait until I go to Clearwater next month.

In my perusing, I encountered an article from The Philadelphia Inquirer titled “Something’s building in Florida” that discusses the 2004 season. I read every word, needing as much information about the Phillies as I can get.

Initially, I was frustrated by it. The key to good writing is brevity, so I despise writers using “well” when it’s unnecessary. Consider this:

[The Phillies] faded last season, but have added a good deal of pitching and have a reasonable expectation that third baseman David Bell will be better because he is not injured and leftfielder Pat Burrell will be better because… well, because it would be hard for him to be worse.

The writer of the article, Bob Ford, built a great argument, incorporating several of the key issues facing the Phillies this season. But that ending kills all momentum. I dare you to tell me that “…and leftfielder Pat Burrell will be better because it would be hard for him to be worse.” isn’t an improvement to that sentence. If you try to tell me it isn’t, I won’t listen because you’d be wrong.

Even with my statement, many writers today would write “I won’t listen because… well, because you’d be wrong.” I’m not many writers.

At that point, I was concerned, but I’ll take bad writing if it gives me baseball information. I continued reading and came to this:

The Phils will have to get along at shortstop with Jimmy Rollins, who is a wonderful fielder but has operated under the mistaken notion that he is also a power hitter.

You’d have to know something about baseball and the Phillies, but I can only say “Amen”. Jimmy, you weigh a buck-nothing. You have speed. Stop being obtuse and understand your role. It’s valuable to the team. Duh.

Next came this comment about replacing Jack Russell Stadium with Bright House Networks Field in Clearwater (the Phillies also open Citizens Bank Park in Philly this season):

The new stadium has a huge modern locker room and a video scoreboard, and there is no outfield wall advertisement for “Lou’s Tattoos,” which is an indication of something or other.

No “Lou’s Tattoos”? Damn, damn, damn. I want tacky local advertisements. How will I enjoy Spring Training if I don’t have the possibility that someone might hit a ball through the eyes of the Hooters owl? Seriously, how? The pain I feel right now is indescribable, so I’ll show you what I’ll be missing.

JRS_Hooters_sign.jpg

For his conclusion, Bob Ford wrote the following:

“Welcome back to baseball. Pitchers, catchers and optimism report today.”

I wish I’d written that line.

A Thousand Words

Now that I have a new scanner, I’m pulling old photographs from their decade-long slumber. The first picture I had to scan was a photo taken by my brother. We were in Philadelphia on August 5, 1990 for Dale Murphy’s second game as a Phillie.

While snapping pictures before the game, we noticed Murphy posing on the field for a photo. My brother took a picture of that scene. A few months later, I opened a pack of 1991 Donruss baseball cards and was stunned into silence. This is why:

Bush’s arms must be tired

President Bush is getting his workout today, again flinging around the term “activist judges”. It’s easy to label someone he doesn’t like. Call them names, put them down, and maybe they’ll go away. If not, at least he’ll have “the people” behind him. The majority wins, no matter what.

Consider this:

“People need to be involved in this decision,” Bush said. “Marriage ought to be defined by the people not by the courts. And I’m watching it carefully.”

The courts are led by people. Those people are trained to interpret the law. When the law conflicts with the Constitution, as it may or may not in this case, it’s the predefined role of the Judiciary to resolve it.

There is a term in software development used when something doesn’t work as hoped but works according to requirements. The term is “works as designed”. Some people wish to amend the Constitution, which is changing the requirements. Until we amend the Constitution to include the belief that all citizens are not equal, the legal system is working as designed. I’m being repetitive in this point, but I fail to understand the error in the process.

Concerning marriage licenses being issued in San Francisco, President Bush had this to say:

“I have watched carefully what’s happening in San Francisco, where licenses were being issued, even though the law states otherwise,” Bush said. “I have consistently stated that I’ll support law to protect marriage between a man and a woman. Obviously these events are influencing my decision.”

Marriage between a man and a woman is not under attack. Equal protection and privilege under the law is the issue.

The trouble that President Bush is having seems to be the morality of same-sex marriage. The Constitution, while influenced by the Bible, is still the supreme document of the United States. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights protect every citizen, and are slowly being interpreted to apply to every citizen. Until everyone enjoys the benefits, situations like this will continue.

The civil institution of marriage must be dictated by the Constitution’s equal protection. However, any church that chooses not to perform same-sex marriage ceremonies is entitled to exercise that right. The law can’t and shouldn’t force religion to change. But the separation of church and state exists for a reason. Trying to encode theology into law isn’t appropriate when the theology involves suggested, non-physical harm and negative consequences.

I know I keep writing about this, but it’s what I care about right now, so this is what I have to give.

Reading from the cookbook

Regarding the same-sex marriage challenge underway in California, I want to comment on this argument from the Alliance Defense Fund‘s legal brief:

If a public official that is part of an administrative agency believes a statute is unconstitutional, he or she may not challenge it by open defiance. If any government official may ignore laws at will, laws have no force, and there is no liberty.

I’ve already expressed my views on this, so I’m not going to rehash them. I’m amused that their lawyers wrote such a poorly thought out brief. Allow me to pick a few nits with those two sentences.

First, “if a public official that…” is incorrect. Public officials are people, not things. “That” should be “who”.

Second, any government official ignoring the law doesn’t imply that laws have no force. Anyone can do anything at any time. I can speed while driving on the highway. You can steal Danielle’s TV and dryer while she’s traveling. The distinction they ignored is that there may be consequences.

Civil disobedience has brought about change when rational arguments couldn’t. This act by San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom may work. It may fail. The point is that he believes he is upholding California’s constitution. Now that some of the citizenry disagrees, the courts will decide.

Third, when laws have no force, there is liberty, contrary to the Alliance Defense Fund’s argument. Without laws, we’re all free to do everything without repercussions. However, when laws have no force, we’re likely to have anarchy. That would’ve been the logical conclusion to the argument, not the absence of liberty.

Now consider this:

Randy Thomasson, founder of Campaign for California Families, called the marriages “a political stunt by an out-of-control mayor who obviously wants to make law by bending the constitution.”

“This is as much about protecting our system of government and respect for the law as it is about the protection of marriage,” Thomasson said.

Again ignoring my beliefs on this issue, I think our system of government is working as designed. San Francisco saw an act of civil disobedience that many believe to be wrong. What response did they give? Did they march on San Francisco’s City Hall and burn it down? Did they tar and feather Mayor Newsom?

None of this happened. No coup, no chaos, no anarchy. The courts will decide, which is how disagreements are resolved in America when both sides can’t agree.

I can’t figure out how this is destroying America.

Skiing (Part Four) – Is this green?

Getting in line, I relaxed slightly, but couldn’t feel joyous about my accomplishment. I’d skied down, but with many false starts and spills. I had to do it again, but I knew my second trip would be like my first. Cold, wet, and painful.

The line for the South chair lift wasn’t crowded, so we headed up the mountain without a wait. Still learning how to walk in skis, I scooted to the starting line, just ahead of our chair. Trying to let the chair catch me from underneath, I anticipated its arrival. I misjudged and got smacked in the leg. It knocked me backward, slamming my butt into the seat.

Generally, they did an excellent job of sweeping snow from the chair, but that doesn’t make it warmer. The temperature was mild, but the metal bars of the chair held the cold. Because I’d skied slowly down the slope, I hadn’t built up a good workout sweat. I shivered, from the cold and the anticipation of having to ski down the slope again.

Danielle encouraged me and worked to focus me on my success and improvement, but I dreaded the experience, so I answered with “yeah, but”. For every incident of me doing something well, however monumental (tiny monumental, but still monumental), I’d point out a little kid skiing with ease down the slope beneath us.

As we continued the journey up, it reminded me of how long the slope was. It’d taken us a few minutes to ride up the first slope, and much longer to ski down as a result of my stalling.

As we reached the top of the mountain, I tried to anticipate how the next journey would turn out. Fortunately, the incline down from the chair to the top of the slope was smaller than the first ride, so I managed this exit without a dismount. Danielle skied ahead to the map while I adjusted my gloves and hat. Hoping to map the quickest route to the parking lot, I joined her for the planning session.

As I looked at the map, I felt bad for her that she was only going to get 2 trips down the slopes and she’s an excellent skier. I suggested that, once we reached the bottom, I’d hang out in the lodge while she skied a few more times. She agreed that we could do that, if I wanted. She reminded me that I was doing well for my first time. Uh, huh.

Looking at the map now, notice that the top of the South Chair lift is the highest peak depicted on the mountain. Forget Everest. I’d reached the top of the world and I had to descend at once if I intended to live another day.

Based on this new plan to make this my last run, we decided to bypass Snow Ball and ski Twinkle, diverting at the Lower Shuttle to end up at the lodge. Scary, but I (incorrectly) figured that half of the journey was sideways across the mountain, so I could manage it. I took a deep breath and we departed.

The path from the map to Twinkle had a slight incline, but it wasn’t steep. Gravity took hold and I accelerated at a manageable pace. Intending to slow down, I scanned around me and noticed traffic. Any drastic panic now would ripple through behind me. I focused on the path instead.

Being in the middle of the lane, I wanted to avoid blocking everyone when I fell, so I edged to the right side of the trail. Once I’d reached the edge, I realized what I’d done. I’d adjusted my skis to turn right, while moving. Amazed, I edged my way to the left. I only moved a few feet to the left, but I moved where I’d intended to move. What was happening?

Instead of sliding quickly down the mountain, I was skiing. I was moving faster, but under control and in my direction of choice. Before I let my mind interfere again, I focused forward and picked up a little more speed. I didn’t want anything dangerous, but I knew I’d unlocked the fear so that it could fade away with continued focus and effort.

Danielle reached the clearing at the top of Twinkle ahead of me, so she’d stopped to check on my progress. She saw me skiing toward her, under control and on pace with everyone around me. Surprised, she smiled, then faced the slope and skied towards the Lower Shuttle. I followed.

I didn’t have enough confidence to ski straight through the turn onto the Lower Shuttle that I knew was coming, so I stopped after I passed Twinkle’s first hill. There was a hill to surmount before the Lower Shuttle, but I wasn’t afraid of it. I wanted to gather my thoughts, focus on the task, and plot my entry into the narrow path that constituted the first half of the Lower Shuttle.

Danielle waited. She was too far away for us to talk, but I could see how excited she was that I’d let go and skied. I gave the thumbs up, followed by a wave to indicate that I needed a second.

I needed to plot my path from the right side of the slope to the left, where I’d connect with the Lower Shuttle. Since left turns were my only strength in the beginning, this didn’t concern me. I looked over my left shoulder to determine the number of people behind.

On the slopes, the person in front of you has the right of way. I knew I’d need that, but sudden moves causing fellow skiers to careen out of control didn’t seem wise. I only needed a short opening because I’d pick up speed this time, but there were a couple of people near me. While I waited, I decided to ski at an angle to the left to cover some distance, ski down the hill to gain speed, then ski left into the Lower Shuttle. I’d use this speed to get as far as I could before I’d have to walk the shuttle. I signaled to Danielle as the traffic behind me cleared. We departed for the hill.

I followed my plan exactly. I’d maneuvered left to the middle of the slope when I reached the hill. I went down, picking up speed as intended. As I neared the bottom of the hill, I turned left and zipped into the Lower Shuttle.

Before I could get overjoyed at the accomplishment, I had to navigate the narrow path. It was ominously lined with orange latticed tape. I’d seen enough competitive skiing on television to know that patches of orange latticed tape, while a warning, also has magnetic powers to attract skis. I used my motorcycle training to “look where I wanted to go”. It worked. Into the turn at a reasonable rate of speed, I turned toward the middle of the shuttle. Unfortunately, I didn’t know that the shuttle has a slight incline, so I didn’t have sufficient speed to reach the top.

Danielle didn’t know that either, so I noticed her in front of me trudging her way up the incline. I caught up with her.

“I can’t believe it. I did it!”

She smiled back at me. “I knew you could. How do you like it now?”

“I don’t know how I did it. I was following you, then I realized that I was skiing, so I kept going.”

“You’re doing a great job.”

We reached the top of the incline. Thunder Run opened onto the Lower Shuttle, so I asked “Which way are we going?” That’s a stupid question, but I was so scared at the top of the slope that I didn’t focus on other slopes. Danielle pointed to the right, where I saw the shuttle open onto the end of Mistletoe, where we’d begun our introductory lesson only a few hours earlier.

We skied towards the end, Danielle next to me until we reached the opening. As we neared I told Danielle to go ahead. The end of Mistletoe would be the steepest incline I’d encountered, so I wanted to make sure no one was near me as I skied down. I stopped and looked around. I let the fear creep back, but quickly squashed that. I took a deep breath, decided to go, and took off.

I swooped back and forth, making exaggerated turns to slow myself down. Once I neared the end, I straightened up and skied to the end. I made an intentional hard stop, turning left and spraying snow to my right s I turned. I raised my hands in triumph. I looked around for Danielle.

Waiting at the chair lift, she smiled. I ventured in her direction, remember
ing the steep journey to the chair lift. As I neared her, she asked “do you want to leave now?”

“We have to do that again. Right now.”

I couldn’t believe it. I’d made it down the slope faster than it took us to go up the chair lift and it wasn’t me tumbling wildly out of control. I loved skiing more than anything in the world at that moment. By accident, I let the joy open for me. I couldn’t wait to do it again.

I chatted like a little kid while Danielle smiled and reaffirmed how well I’d done. The lift came and carried us up the slope again. As we rode up the slope, snow began to fall. A snow mobile rode up the slope below us. That Guy rode past us down the chair lift.

Looking around while we chatted, the mountain no longer looked intimidating. I watched little kids jetting around other skiers and snowboarders racing down the hill. I understood why they did it instead of being perplexed by it.

I noticed the snowboarder in front of us didn’t have his safety bar pulled down. “That guy is balls-to-the-wall,” I said.

“Did you just say balls-to-the-wall?”

“I did because that guy is crazy and doesn’t have the safety bar down.” I pointed. She laughed and agreed.

We reached the top of the lift. I prepared for the exit, pointing my skis perpendicular to the ground. My skis settled onto the ramp. I stood up. Learning from my last experience, I leaned forward. I zoomed down the ramp and away from the lift. Cleared from the lift, I was still standing. Outstanding.

We skied to the South Shuttle. Again, learning from my last experience, I picked skied down the first hill, picking up speed instead of slowing myself down. After running out of momentum again, we walked scooted to the opening for Twinkle. Without pause, we headed down.

Skiing down the slope, turning left and right to slow myself when necessary, I approached the Lower Shuttle within seconds. This trip, I had enough speed to maintain my momentum. Once again, I noticed the orange latticed tape, then shifted my sight to where I wanted to go.

Racing through the shuttle, I looked at Danielle and said “Is this green?”

Laughing, she said no. I’m glad I didn’t know that before because I would’ve been nervous. With my ignorance, I’d skied the harder part of a Blue Square shuttle on my second and third trips down a slope.

We continued through the shuttle, me following behind Danielle. I didn’t pause at Mistletoe, choosing to ski it while I had momentum. When we reached the bottom, there was no question we’d be skiing again. We headed to the chair lift.

We got in line and caught the chair lift almost immediately. For a beautiful January day, the crowd was perfect. I don’t have any comparison, but the weather was wonderful, so I’d assume it would pull more skiers. No complaints.

On the lift, we continued chatting. Danielle almost dropped her poles. I almost dropped my gloves. Snow accumulated on our clothes. The snow mobile passed under us again.

At the top, we followed the same path to Twinkle. When we reached the entrance to Thunder Run, Danielle decided that she wanted to ski a Blue Square. I told her I’d be fine and I’d meet her on the Lower Shuttle. She headed down as I worked my way to Twinkle.

Once at Twinkle, I took off immediately, despite some apprehension that if I wiped out, I’d have no familiar face to rescue me. I didn’t need to worry.

I entered the South Shuttle at my fastest speed yet, focusing on making a tighter turn to the inside once I’d reached it. This worked perfectly, except for one thing.

When I reached Danielle, who was waiting for me, I said “I can’t see a shittin’, fuckin’ thing.” She started laughing.

“Seriously, the falling snow is in my face. I’m skiing with my eyes nearly closed. But I don’t trust the goggles.”

“Are you going to be ok,” she asked.

“I’ll be fine. I just need to get real goggles for next time.”

We continued through the Lower Shuttle and headed towards the bottom of Mistletoe.

I let Danielle go ahead while I adjusted my hat and scarf against the snow. I didn’t want to get snow in my face as I tackled the steep bottom of Mistletoe. After checking the traffic, I journeyed down the slope. Danielle was waiting in at the chair lift with her camera. Here’s the video she took:

Video: This isn't green!

We got on the chair lift again. While journeying up the mountain, we chatted about my readiness for a Blue Square. I knew I wouldn’t ski one that day, but it was an interesting turn from being frustrated by the sport earlier in the day. As we rode up, the snow mobile passed us again on its way up the mountain.

At the top, we noticed the beauty of the trees as the lights came on and snow continued to fall. Since we were taking a moment to enjoy the experience, I knew it was the right time to bring up an important topic.

“We should decide now how many more trips down the mountain we’re going to take. We’re too excited at the bottom to say no and it’s getting colder. I also need to munch.”

“That’s a good idea. How many more trips do you think?”

“We should just make this the last one.”

“I agree, two more trips is perfect.”

“Two?”

“Yes, three more and then we’re done.”

“Ok, we’ll take two more, then see how we feel. Agreed?”

“Agreed.”

We skied over to Twinkle.

Part five (the ending) still to come…

Stealing ideas

Danielle received a comment on her entry “ICH BIN EIN GOOGLE RESULTAT”, plugging RollingDoughnut.com because I get better Google searches. Specifically, Gump left the following comment for Danielle: “I am jealous that Tony is just out there without a host. How many readers does he get?”

In just a statement and a question, Gump summed up my webmaster duties for my blog. I chose to set up this site on my own, to code it and to maintain it for one simple reason: I love the challenge of figuring out new tasks. If the new task is related to technology, it’s even better. I love that I’m only constrained by my imagination. If I want to add a database to my blog, I can do that. If I want to add a guestbook, I can code that. It takes me longer than just snapping together assembled parts like Legos, but it’s more fun for me. Since no one is paying me to do this, I’m going to have fun.

There’s nothing wrong with sites like Diaryland and LiveJournal. They can even make life easier for writers. With the built-in community, they enable writers to get readers quicker. But they don’t suit my mentality.

I’ve chosen to bypass that and build everything myself. Initially, I was doing it because I like the “empire building” involved in starting from scratch. Rather than torture, becoming a hermit, learning to code a website is my idea of a glorious adventure.

Yet, as much fun as I have in my empire building, I’ve learned that the true value is in giving my writing time to evolve and improve. Looking back over some of my earliest posts, I’m stunned by the progression. As I near my 100th post, I now have an archive that allows new readers to jump in. I can begin marketing with a foundation to support my “sales pitch”.

The result of my labor is that I now get between 7 and 10 unique hits every day. Even though that doesn’t seem huge, I’ve seen my hits creep upward over the last few months.

I write for the joy of writing, not the readership. Whether the number is 7, 70, or 700 people who read my site, I write for myself and everyone else is a bonus. But I enjoy that people are reading my words. I know everyone won’t agree with me, but people are thinking about my ideas. What more could I ask for, besides $100,000?

In conclusion, I like independence. It’s good.

Alienating my last reader

Students around the nation are promoting today as the Day of Purity to promote abstinence outside of marriage among teens. I don’t have a problem with encouraging sexual abstinence for teens because most are not mature enough to handle the ramifications. However, “purity” is an awful choice to describe this.

Mimicking my thoughts is this quote:

“The word ‘purity’ in this context is morally self-righteous,” said Alice Leeds, a spokeswoman for Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays. “It’s redefining it in their context to conform to their frankly bigoted agenda.”

It’s too easy to throw words around instead of ideas, so I wouldn’t use “bigoted” to describe it. “Morally self-righteous” was correct. Misguided, too. Purity in this context implies that not engaging in sex is pure and engaging in sex is dirty. Generalizations won’t make the situation better.

Encouraging teens to have sex is not good policy. Pretending that teens don’t engage in sex is worse. As it’s taught here, it’s thought control with no more support than “Because we say so”. I didn’t like that argument as a kid and I know teens haven’t changed since then.

Consider this:

“A lot of girls feel that in order to keep their relationship, they have to have sex,” said Kelly Cruse, 16, who plans to pass out sexual abstinence literature at her high school in Illinois. “I think this need for acceptance is very destructive to a girl.”

Sex isn’t the issue in this example. Any girl who feels pressured to have sex, regardless of age, shouldn’t be engaging in sex. We need to teach children to have confidence and strength of character. We must treat children as people instead of owned things. When a child has that foundation, he/she will make quality choices. We’re too busy teaching them what to think that we overlook teaching them how to think.

Now that I’ve offered my thoughts, I present this picture. It’s so fundamentally stupid that I’m not going to comment.

billboard.jpg

I’ll need estrogen to understand

I spent 15 minutes discussing shoes with a woman in my office. She now has 90 pair of shoes, after throwing 20 away when she moved. I’m amazed that anyone could own that many shoes. As you’ll remember, I did admit to becoming a shoe whore for Chucks, but I know I haven’t owned 90 pair of shoes in my lifetime.

However, since I’ve learned from the master, I knew to ask the correct question. “Have you ever bought shoes that weren’t the right size because you needed that specific model?” My co-worker started laughing hysterically, then nodded that she had. Chalk one up for straight men.