From Politico on Sen. Obama and gay equal rights:
So he took a different tack: “Now I’m a Christian, and I praise Jesus every Sunday,” he said, to a sudden wave of noisy applause and cheers.
“I hear people saying things that I don’t think are very Christian with respect to people who are gay and lesbian,” he said, and the crowd seemed to come along with him this time.
…his ability to sell gay rights in the black church is unique and appealing.
To which Andrew Sullivan replies:
Now you may have many reasons not to vote for Obama, and no gay voter should vote on one issue. But solely with respect to gay matters, there is simply no choice here. Obama’s positions, candor, courage, generation and religious embrace of us are dispositive.
Why is there no choice? Or, to be clear, why is there a different choice other than choosing neither candidate in this election on equal rights for gay Americans, just like every other election leading up to this one?
Sen. Obama is not selling equal rights. He’s said nothing more than so-called Christians are saying nasty things about gay Americans. He’s calling for such rhetoric to stop. He did not call for action to correct the separate legal treatment. For several years now, he’s had the opportunity to act, to sponsor legislation ending official United States bigotry. Has he sponsored a repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, the most obvious target available to him as a senator?
At least the traveling salesman carries a product sample when he pitches grandiose claims as he stands on your front porch.
This crossed my aggregator earlier today.
I had forgotten how scary the words “bully pulpit” are.
That’s a less-than-robust solution. He’ll fight for equality, except he’ll keep the federal government out to let states decide for themselves? Where does that leave society when we institutionalize separate-but-equal again? Lunacy.